Best Courtroom away from Ca
Some one v. Figueroa (1986) 41 Cal.3d 714 , 224 Cal.Rptr. 719; 715 P.2d 680 [Crim. Zero. 24252. Supreme Court regarding California. April seven, 1986.]
(View from the Bird, C. J., which have Mosk, Broussard, Grodin, JJ., and Takei (Taketsugu), J., concurring. Separate concurring thoughts from the Reynoso, J., that have Lucas, J., concurring.)
John K. Van de Kamp, Attorneys General, Edward P. O’Brien, Assistant Attorney Standard, Derald Age. Granberg and Robert R. Granucci, Deputy Attorney Standard, to own Plaintiff and Respondent.
The principal question showed from this interest is whether the fresh demonstration judge, when you look at the an effective prosecution towards deals away from unqualified securities, erred [41 Cal.three dimensional 718] into the instructing the newest jury that certain “Enterprise Promissory Notes” was “securities” in the concept of the corporate Bonds Laws. (Corp. Code, § 25000 et seq. fn. 1)
Stanford Law University – Robert Top Law Collection
Joseph and you will Dennis Figueroa desire of a view regarding conviction to own you to count off promoting unqualified ties. (§§ 25110, 25540.) The newest jury deadlocked toward thirteen even more counts, 7 so-called up against Joseph and you will four against Dennis.